Skip to main content

A Review of "Art of Magic: The Gathering--Innistrad"

 

            “Art of Magic: The Gathering—Innistrad” by James Wyatt tells the story of Innistrad, a plane (world) in the Magic: The Gathering multiverse. You may think that Magic is just some card game and this book won’t be very interesting. If you think this, then you are wrong. “Art of Magic: The Gathering” is an excellent book for anyone who likes the fantasy and horror genres, even if they don’t play Magic.

            Innistrad is a plane where humans are slain by vampires, slaughtered by werewolves, and haunted by the spirits of the dead. Ghoulcallers reanimate corpses to do their bidding, and skaberen stitch the limbs of dead humans into artificial lifeforms called skaabs. Humans depend greatly on Avacyn, an angel who was created to protect them from these horrors. Avacyn has an entire religion created around her. Her high church is in the city Thraban. Her angels and cathars slay vampires and werewolves and protect humans, and humans use Avacynian spells and wards to protect themselves. But, unfortunately for everyone on Innistrad, multiple times has a major turn of events caused Avacyn to be unable to protect the people of Innistrad.

            The first time this happened, the demon Griselbrand challenged Avacyn. They fought for multiple days. At the end of the fight, Avacyn tried to imprison Griselbrand in the Helvault, the silver monolith that Avacyn uses to imprison demons and other powerful creatures, but Griselbrand stabbed her with his claw and pulled her into the Helvault with him. This caused the protective wards to fail and led to the people of Innistrad being significantly more vulnerable to the evil creatures that Avacyn was supposed to protect them from.

            The second time this happened, something caused Avacyn and the other angels to go insane. They started killing the people they were supposed to protect. The members of the Lunarch Council were confused and frightened by Avacyn’s madness. Worse, some of the members were actually demon-worshipping cultists who were trying to weaken the church. These cultists helped frenzy the other members. Eventually, the members of the Lunarch Council were convinced that the sin of the people was the cause of Avacyn’s madness. They started an inquisition to root out the sinners. Inquisitors went from village to village carrying out bloody executions of people they thought were sinners. The church had essentially turned on the people. I will leave the cause of Avacyn’s madness and what happens next as a surprise to anyone who wants to read the book.

            As the name implies, “Art of Magic: The Gathering—Innistrad” has art in it. It has large and detailed pictures, which come from the pictures on existing Magic cards. These pictures are usually cover more than half of a page (the pages are almost the size of one square foot), and some even cover two full pages. They also have almost lifelike detail. They help the reader envision Innistrad as if they were on Innistrad, seeing it themselves. The art alone could be reason to take a look at “Art of Magic: The Gathering—Innistrad.”

            Anyways, I think “Art of Magic: The Gathering—Innistrad” is a great book. In addition to having a fairly interesting plot, it really developed Innistrad as a world. The book mostly describes its different aspects, such as Avacyn and her church, Innistrad’s provinces, and its monsters. I decided not to describe them in much detail, because it would be pointless to try to talk about them all in this blog post. If you want to learn more about them, I recommend you read the book.


Written by Samuel

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sequels vs. Series Ft. Parasite Pig

            Sequels especially movie sequels often get a bad rep for being boring money makers and they never seem to live up to the original content. Some examples of these sequels are the ones that Disney makes for many of their franchises. But there are also sequels that aren't so bad, such as a book I recently read, Parasite Pig. So I wondered, what makes a sequel good, and what makes them bad?     I think first we need to take into consideration the difference between sequels and series. Sequels usually come after a story that was already wrapped up. The main plot was resolved and usually, nothing needs to be added. In the original content, there's not just story telling, but world building and character development. These things are usually lost in sequels because they are simply not needed, but without them, the story turns out to be rather lackluster. Also, in most cases, sequels just do not need to exist. The original story is f...
12 comments
Read more

The Two Forms of History Nonfiction

    History books are some of the most popular nonfiction books, and they are my favorite type of nonfiction books. The scope of these books can vary wildly, and they can focus on the most minute details of a historical event or they can give the entire story of a region, country, or period. The wide variety of topics covered in different history books means that there is a wide variety of writing styles, but I have separated these styles into two broad categories: Novels and Textbooks.     History books that I would call a novel are called that because of how the book is written as a story. Writing a historical book as a story mainly means that like a novel there is a setting, plot, and many times a few central people who are essential to the story and quoted frequently. These types of books are usually about a specific project or group of people, and are about more recent events (~1900-present) because the record keeping is better and more quotes are avai...
6 comments
Read more

Comparing the Book to the Movie: Why it's Stupid

By Walter Kraatz       The use of a book as the premise for a movie has happened since the beginning of film with early 20th  century adaptions of Frankenstein and Cinderella being prime examples. The comparison of a book and its movie is a popular point of discussion and contention between book nerds and film nerds. This comparison between a book and film, while fun, is inherently flawed because of the differences between the two mediums.     The most obvious and important difference between a book and a film is the visual element present in a film that is absent in a book. Even if a film is based on a comic book or graphical novel the amount of detail that can be shown in a film exceeds the book because of the movements and expressions of the actors and the detailed background images that can be limited by print quality in a comic book. Because of the lack of a visual element in a book the author must provide a description which can be interpreted b...
11 comments
Read more