Skip to main content

The hypocritical Phoniness of Holden Caufield.

     Despite his frequent rants against the phoniness of everyone else Holden is at times a bit of a phony himself. While he is constantly telling the reader all of his thoughts and how he's upset that more people don't speak their minds, there are a few circumstances where he hides his true thoughts. 

One of the times when Holden is the most phony is when he is talking to Ernest Morrow's mother on the train to New York from Pencey. Holden harbors very negative feelings for Ernest and calls him "doubtless the biggest bastard that ever went to Pencey, in the whole crumby history of the school" but despite holding such disdain for Ernest he still cannot bring himself to talk bad about a child directly to his mother. In fact Holden goes further than just not talking bad about Ernest but actually reassuring Mrs. Morrow that her child was a great guy who everyone wanted to be class president. You could argue that Holden is playing the long con just to mess with Ernest, but it seems to me that he really just can't stand to see a sad mother.

    The opening of the book also features an excellent example of Holden being quite the phony when he is talking to Mr. Spencer about his failing his classes and being kicked out of Pencey. While Mr. Spencer is lecturing Holden about the way that he needs to live his life and how he should apply himself to his education, Holden is dissecting the lecture and explaining why its all wrong, but just to the reader. Holden doesn't voice his feelings on the contents of this lecture to Mr. Spencer, but rather just says the right things to keep the man happy. Withholding true feelings to keep people happy is one of Holden's primary issues with other people yet he can't help doing it himself. 

  

    


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sequels vs. Series Ft. Parasite Pig

            Sequels especially movie sequels often get a bad rep for being boring money makers and they never seem to live up to the original content. Some examples of these sequels are the ones that Disney makes for many of their franchises. But there are also sequels that aren't so bad, such as a book I recently read, Parasite Pig. So I wondered, what makes a sequel good, and what makes them bad?     I think first we need to take into consideration the difference between sequels and series. Sequels usually come after a story that was already wrapped up. The main plot was resolved and usually, nothing needs to be added. In the original content, there's not just story telling, but world building and character development. These things are usually lost in sequels because they are simply not needed, but without them, the story turns out to be rather lackluster. Also, in most cases, sequels just do not need to exist. The original story is f...

Interstellar Pig

Interstellar Pig is a sci-fi book written by William Sleator. A teenager named Barney is on vacation on a beach with his parents and 3 peculiar neighbors moved into the cottage next to their rented house. The neighbors are oddly obsessed with a board game called interstellar pig and the history of Barney’s rented house. Barney was intrigued by the neighbors and the board game, but his curiosity caused him to be dragged into a complicated mess holding multiple alien species at large risk. I’d say it’s an average read, not spectacular, but not terrible. You can read it pretty fast and it’s not hard at all. It’s like one of those books that you forget about after reading them and there isn’t much that sticks with you after you finish. There is just a mystery, a climax, and a resolution.  Despite its slight blandness, the premise of the story is pretty interesting and there is a lot of foreshadowing and clues written into the story in a way readers can pick up on them and think about w...

The Two Forms of History Nonfiction

    History books are some of the most popular nonfiction books, and they are my favorite type of nonfiction books. The scope of these books can vary wildly, and they can focus on the most minute details of a historical event or they can give the entire story of a region, country, or period. The wide variety of topics covered in different history books means that there is a wide variety of writing styles, but I have separated these styles into two broad categories: Novels and Textbooks.     History books that I would call a novel are called that because of how the book is written as a story. Writing a historical book as a story mainly means that like a novel there is a setting, plot, and many times a few central people who are essential to the story and quoted frequently. These types of books are usually about a specific project or group of people, and are about more recent events (~1900-present) because the record keeping is better and more quotes are avai...